BARAK BAVER

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with BARAK BAVER

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BARAK BAVER is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Avondale Estates of Elgin Role: corporate officer	No. of Beds: 120 ELGIN, IL Ranking: #39 out of 133 (Ranking List)
Gilman Healthcare Center Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 99 GILMAN, IL Ranking: #7 out of 12 (Ranking List)
Norridge Gardens Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 292 NORRIDGE, IL Ranking: #207 out of 251 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with BARAK BAVER

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BARAK BAVER was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Zahav of Berwyn Most Recent Record: 04/01/2019 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 145 BERWYN, IL Ranking: #188 out of 279 (Ranking List)
Accolade Healthcare of Savoy Most Recent Record: 06/01/2024 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 213 SAVOY, IL Ranking: #10 out of 10 (Ranking List)
Gardenview Manor Most Recent Record: 08/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 213 DANVILLE, IL Ranking: #10 out of 12 (Ranking List)
Ahva Care of Stickney Most Recent Record: 02/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 51 STICKNEY, IL Ranking: #42 out of 268 (Ranking List)
Ahva Care of Winfield Most Recent Record: 05/01/2022 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 138 WINFIELD, IL Ranking: #79 out of 247 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.